News from Peterborough City CouncilStreet trading application refused26 June 2008 |
Communications Team
Town Hall
Peterborough
PE1 1HG
Telephone: 01733 747474
|
Following an appeal application being received from Sahin
Karayilan (formerly known as Muhtalip Ceylan) to trade in the
Flaxland lay-by on Bretton Way, in Peterborough, the Licensing
Committee has upheld the decision taken by the Licensing Team to
refuse Mr Karayilan's application to trade at this location.
Peterborough City Council's Licensing Committee carried out
the appeal according to The Local Government (Miscellaneous
Provisions) Act 1982 Schedule 4 on Tuesday (24 June). After very
careful consideration, the committee gave the reasons for its
refusal, which included the following; the number of food outlets
in the area is sufficient, so there is no need for any other food
outlets; additional food outlets in this area would cause
unnecessary road safety issues; there are concerns regarding the
applicant's previous trading history at this site.
As part of the appeal process, representations were received
from local residents, businesses and the Highways Department. These
related to issues such as lack of hygiene, road safety, regularly
trading outside of consented hours, ignoring advice and
instructions from licensing enforcement officers and lateness in
renewing consents.
Mr Karayilan's solicitor stated that the appeal application
related to a newer and more up-to-date mobile unit, which would be
used and removed each evening. Hygiene certificates for the
applicant were also produced but despite this, the committee still
felt that Mr Karayilan's application should be refused.
Jane Bosworth, the city council's licensing enforcement
officer, said: "The process for applying for a new street trading
static consent is very simple. Initially, consultation takes place
with the Highways Department and ward councillors. Following any
representations received, the final decision on whether to grant a
consent rests with Adrian Day, the principal licensing
officer.
"Each application is determined on its individual merits and
if refused gives the applicant the right to appeal to the Licensing
Committee. The latter was the case for Mr Karayilan. There is no
further right of appeal for the applicant except for Judicial
Review."
The committee stressed that their decision should not affect
Mr Karayilan's ability to make a further application to trade at
another location.
Ends.
